#MAXQDA DEDUCE HOW TO#

You can not imagine how much I hate praise. All comments are welcomed although I mediate all comments and do not publish comments that are just praising me or praising the article or the comments that do not add much. Please finish reading this article, you will learn a lot! I promise you! Many colleagues, staffs and supervisors from the University of St Andrews and several others Scottish universities such as the University of Dundee, University of Edinburgh among others are very happy with the advice given in this article and they are suggesting it to their students. One of the basic requirements for a good literature review is that it should engages critically and scholarly with ideas and works of other researchers. Nothing impressive from the point of the view of a marker or a paper reviewer.

#MAXQDA DEDUCE HOW TO#

All students are showing to a marker, a reviewer or an examiner, is the fact that they know how to read, how to summarise and rephrase and how to cite sources. I used to write literature reviews as laundry lists of relevant works so I was not an exception in any way. A Literature Review is also called “ Related Work” and “ Literature Search“.Īll these terms highlights the main aim of a literature review which is to critique, analyse, contrast and compare relevant works in the literature.Ī lot of literature reviews that Masters students and PhD candidates normally write end up being laundry or shopping lists of research that they think is related to their work. This article is mainly written for Masters and PhD students who are writing literature reviews for their dissertations and PhD theses.Ī good literature review is a considerable undertaking. You should call your Literature Review (LR) by three words: ‘ Critical Literature Review’ and not by two words and this is because what you call it makes a difference! It ingrains in your subconscious what a literature review really is.

Maxqda deduce